[Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus]

Do you believe (or expect me to believe) that saying the philosophy is their basis for existence doesn't imply that they would not have existed without it?

Look, show me where I said anything about them not existing without the philosophy of evolutionism in the first place. You can answer a simple question, right?

[tacticalogic]

Look, show me where I said anything about them not existing without the philosophy of evolutionism in the first place. You can answer a simple question, right?

You claim it is their "basis for existence". How would they exist without it? You didn't say so explicitly, but it is a logical consequence of what you did say. If your statements will not bear examination of their logical consequences, what good are they?