Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
This assertion is nonsensical. Are there far more Norwegians born than can survive to reproduce? Is your pet cat busy producing "far more offspring" than can survive? What about you?

I haven't, but my father was one of 12 children, eleven of whom lived and married. My mother was one of seven. Medicine and effective birth control are rather new. Most families before 1900 lost children. Nearly every couple that doesn't use birth control will lose a pregnancy; most of the time this will be called a "late period," but it will be a spontaneous abortion.

As for cats, if you have to ask, you don't know much about cats.

537 posted on 06/27/2007 7:16:46 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
I haven't

Which is enough to prove that "every single organic being around us may be said to be striving to the utmost to increase in numbers" is false.

my father was one of 12 children, eleven of whom lived and married

Which is enough to refute both Mayr's assertion "all the individuals of a population... are exposed to the adversity of the environment, and almost all of them perish or fail to reproduce" and your assertion: "the process of reproduction creates far more offspring than survive to reproduce."

574 posted on 06/30/2007 3:20:59 AM PDT by Ethan Clive Osgoode (see FR homepage for Euvolution v0.2.1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson