[MHGinTN]

Excuse this question from up on the porch, but could you explain this to a simple man looking on? ... "Without a God, who would there be to grant them (unalienable rights) to?"

[tacticalogic]

"Without a God, who would there be to grant them (unalienable rights) to?"

Within the context of the discussion (relating to evolution/evolutionists and creation/creationists), the question seems nonsensical.

Assuming the question is posed by a creationist (which seems a reasonable assumption), speculating on whether we would have inalienable rights without a God is pointless. If you really believe in creation then without a God it should be inconceivable that we would even be here to have those rights granted to us.