Where did I maintain that?
You cannot hide behind an argument of "moral equivalency," or of groundless personal bias here; i.e., my supposed lack of "objectivity." The distinctions I draw are perfectly "objective."
137 posted on 06/22/2007 9:41:47 AM PDT by betty boop
That appears to be a claim of perfect objectivity and absence of personal bias in the matter of what is and isn't "creationism".