tactic-—And when weve figured out why were applying one standard to the physical and another to the metaphysical, we can explore why trying to hold them to the same standard - that each deals with only that in its own realm and cant be faulted for not addressing things outside that realm - is hypocrisy.
Irish-—In other words, you believe that you’re just an animal with an animals instincts. Thus if, let’s say, you’re a dog, then you ought not be held accountable for ‘doing what dogs do” because you’re just a dog and can’t help doing what dogs do. Of course, dogs can be trained by a superior life form, and that’s exactly the view held by Laventi Beria (Psychopolitics), Lenin, etc. This encapsulates your dreadful worldview,
Now if God created you, then you are both corporeal (material) and incorporeal (spiritual). In this view, you come fully equipped with free will, mind, soul, individuality, conscience, memory, etc. And because you’re made in the image of He who created the universe, you also possess innate dignity, worth, meaning, purpose, and so on. Our founders summarized this view thusly: “that all men are CREATED equal and endowed by the CREATOR with certain unalienable (means not from man but from God) rights...”
Your Creator gave you the ability to choose either Him or man, and being viewd as a dumb animal. Man takes away your choice.
Are you submitting that is a necessary consequence of being corporeal? That is the context of what you're replying to.
Judging by the responses, it appears that the question cannot be answered because it was blasphemy to ask in the first place.