[Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus]

Can you point me to a standard reference on philosophy that lays out the tenants of this philosophy of evolutionism, just so I know exactly what you mean when you use the term?

What is your definition of a "standard" reference? And does your definition coincide with the definition that others might give as to what is a "standard" reference on the subject? And of course, your question is somewhat dishonest, since my arguments are "non-standard" (meaning, they won't be featured in your typical and supportive reference works about evolution), since I am presenting original argumentation to support my contentions. Besides, since you're so good at divining meaning from what people haven't said, why don't you take a crack at reading what they have said, and criticially think about what you've read?

For everyone following the thread - evolution-friendly source work, accessible to all with internet access - The Journal of Evolutionary Philsophy Just to show I'm fair.

[tacticalogic]

And of course, your question is somewhat dishonest, since my arguments are "non-standard" (meaning, they won't be featured in your typical and supportive reference works about evolution), since I am presenting original argumentation to support my contentions.

So, I'm being "dishonest" by assuming that the terms you're using have the commonly understood and accepted meanings, when you're actually making up new definitions as you go?