1 posted on
06/19/2007 6:40:57 PM PDT by
SandRat
To: SandRat
Are they trying to get rid of our private property?
2 posted on
06/19/2007 6:43:23 PM PDT by
freekitty
To: SandRat
Ah, communes. Didn’t the generation of peace and love try this already?
To: SandRat
All the Chicken Littles can volunteer to move in together. They will cure the depressed housing market as prime property goes up for sale.
It will be better than Big Brother watching all the enlightened, caring people turn on each other in a matter of days.
5 posted on
06/19/2007 6:45:37 PM PDT by
relictele
To: SandRat
I think he's talking about something like this:
You first, buddy.
7 posted on
06/19/2007 6:49:43 PM PDT by
randog
(What the...?!)
To: SandRat
When we (my wife, six children and I) lived in a single-family home in Orangevale, we drove the kids to several play dates every weekend. Since moving into Nevada City cohousing over a year ago, we havent had to plan any play dates. Shoulda lived in China. He wouldn't have had to worry about play dates.
9 posted on
06/19/2007 6:56:09 PM PDT by
Larry Lucido
(Duncan Hunter 2008)
To: SandRat
Collective housing. I live in a condo - but hey, I own MY unit. Here with "cohousing" - the socialists want you to share even the bathrooms! Yikes!
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
10 posted on
06/19/2007 6:58:15 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: SandRat
To each according to his needs, which means about ten square feet per person.
11 posted on
06/19/2007 7:00:46 PM PDT by
Excellence
(Three million years is enough! Stop cyclical climate change now!)
To: SandRat
By supporting lifestyle and behavior changes that are good for the environment, cohousing integrates social sustainability with environmental sustainability.
Not only will I be living in a cave, but, I will have to share it with anybody that the managers assign there.
12 posted on
06/19/2007 7:02:25 PM PDT by
crazyhorse691
(The faithful will keep their heads down, their powder dry and hammer at the enemies flanks.)
To: SandRat
Laugh if you will, but this is the future. People will be packed in tight. As many as two people (plus servants) will be crammed into 28,000 square foot houses. It will become even more crowded when family comes to visit.
15 posted on
06/19/2007 7:06:40 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(A base looking for a party.)
To: SandRat
John Edwards has plenty of cohousing space...
To: SandRat
When we (my wife, six children and I) lived in a single-family home in Orangevale, we drove the kids to several play dates every weekend. Since moving into Nevada City cohousing over a year ago, we havent had to plan any play dates. This goofball must have overlooked the Zero Population Growth memo. Anybody dumb enough to fall for this crap deserves to share a wall with Dr. and Mrs. Moonbeam and their rug rats.
19 posted on
06/19/2007 7:10:54 PM PDT by
bikerMD
(Beware, the light at the end of the tunnel may be a muzzle flash.)
To: SandRat
Communes, eh? As I recall, communal flats were quite common in old Soviet Russia...It's a ploy to take away our private property disguised as some noble cause to stop "global warming", which doesn't exist from CO2 emissions anyway. Geez, stupid communists...the Bullshitvik Party strikes again...
23 posted on
06/19/2007 7:13:27 PM PDT by
G8 Diplomat
(Senators suck...the ones in Washington and on Ottawa's NHL team)
To: SandRat
Frog meet pot.
Relax everyone, *they’re* just getting us slowly used to gulags and Soviet style living conditions.
24 posted on
06/19/2007 7:13:39 PM PDT by
TheSpottedOwl
(Head Caterer for the FIRM)
To: SandRat
I rememer when the Sierra Club was about 80 members and they were all young adult play boy ski bums from Bel Aire, Brentwood, and similar areas and all they cared about was preserving their cross country ski areas in the Sierras.
I knew a couple of them.
In later years they were taken over by the enviro whackos that really don’t care one bit about the enviroment but only to lead their stupid, robot follerers into giving them money thinking they are promoting some worthy cause, all the leaders care aboutt ia socializing/communising the country.
Years ago one of their presidents came out and stated that “our ultimate goal is to eliminate all humans west of the Rockies”.
34 posted on
06/19/2007 7:24:57 PM PDT by
dalereed
To: SandRat
They will be knocking on our doors to introduce us to Pedro, Maria, lil’ Pedro, Yalonda, Hector, Juanita, Lupe, Uncle Romero, and Grandma Rosie.
You will be forced at to accept the above into your home. This will be cohousing.
39 posted on
06/19/2007 7:28:01 PM PDT by
jblair
(Air Force Brat)
To: SandRat
Well, we share a basketball hoop with our neighbors at the end of our cul de sac. Does that count as co-housing? Who would have guessed that we’re a gaia-friendly green family. Think I’ll turn the air conditioning down to 68 to celebrate!
To: SandRat
There is much discussion about switching to compact fluorescent bulbs and hybrid automobiles. These changes will help No, they won't. They will have absolutely no effect whatever, as far as global warming goes. Why do people believe this crap?
42 posted on
06/19/2007 7:35:22 PM PDT by
Cymbaline
(I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stress I repeat myself when under stres)
To: SandRat
I have an old email from a Sierra Club staffer. Their leadership lives as well as Al Gore. They like the contributions from the enviro-suckers.
46 posted on
06/19/2007 7:42:03 PM PDT by
paguch
To: SandRat
49 posted on
06/19/2007 7:50:20 PM PDT by
jer33 3
To: SandRat
I believe those are called “compounds”. The Branch dividians tried it at Waco, but it did not work out too well.
53 posted on
06/20/2007 9:57:45 AM PDT by
PsyOp
(Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson