Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sonny M
Push to overturn Roe vs Wade and then kick it back to the states again, the way it used to be.

Some states will ban abortion, many won't. Women will go across state lines. I don't see this as a solution.

5 posted on 06/19/2007 6:49:06 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Rudder
Some states will ban abortion, many won't. Women will go across state lines. I don't see this as a solution.

I'm not saying its the solution, but its how the country operated from the begining up until roe vs wade came along.

Though Thompson, during senate, voted for every single abortion restriction that came up for vote. In one of those weird twists of irony, if roe vs wade is overturned, there can be no national ban of abortion, and all the restrictions probably go pop too, at the same time, about 3 quaters of the country have existing laws banning abortion already on the books from before 1973.

To go further, the only solution would be a anti-abortion amendment to the constitution, and there has never been enough momentum for it.

7 posted on 06/19/2007 6:56:30 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Rudder
Some states will ban abortion, many won't. Women will go across state lines. I don't see this as a solution.

Well then you need to address your concerns to Congress and to your State Legislature. Fred proposes to do all that the Constitution authorizes the President to do. The rest is up to others under our Constitution.

8 posted on 06/19/2007 6:58:42 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson