Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigun
I was trying to get to the meat of the legislation that was vetoed, so let me re-phrase the question to be more definite.

Assuming that the land needed includes the entire property, should the property owner receive market value or something higher?

69 posted on 06/19/2007 1:53:47 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Ben Ficklin
Assuming that the land needed includes the entire property, should the property owner receive market value or something higher?

It that circumstance he should receive market value for the land and be reimbursed for any damages (costs) the taking caused his operations.

71 posted on 06/19/2007 2:08:31 PM PDT by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson