Well I appreciat your rather polite and well discussed post! That’s the way it should be.. (I believe so as a Christian, anyway..).
Coyoteman I think the problem acutally arises when one finds that these “blood”-and yes they aren’t fully examined, but many chemists and biologists haved states these can only have been blood! Like I was saying the real problem comes when one sees that things like blood and DNA easily and readily bio-degrade when left to nature..also that some of these bones were found not only in Alaska (where freezing would (one would presume) considerably lengthen the time that tissue/bone would be preserved), but some bones were found buried in Cretecious rock in MT).
It is an enigma to (darwinists) yet I would contend they were from Dinos that died much later..possibly only thousands of years ago.
How were they “dated” to 65million years (as you say) can you provide me with a link, becuase if it just was by “stratification” or other such dating, well then that may be disputed.
Please provide me with a link.
Protein Fragments Sequenced in 68 million-year-old Tyrannosaurus Rex
NC State Paleontologist to Present Theories of Fossil Preservation at AAAS Conference
I don't see anything right away that details the dating, but likewise there does not appear to be anything to suggest these specimens are consistent with a young earth idea.
Off to bed. Night!
JS- Not that I beleive what evo says, but the person who found hte blood in the first place has come up with an elaborate hypothsesis of how it MIGHT have been preserved for what she believes is millions of years- There will never be evidnece enough to convince evo folks that something might not be as old as they think because some elaborate unprovable hypothesis will be advanced in order to explain it away. You can find the blood-finder’s hypothesis if you do a google search on her name. But there just is not enough evidnece on this great green earth to convince a person who is adamant that God couldn’t have specially created species that something found might not be as old as they think. To admit that would be to have to admit they’ve made a huge leap of faith that turned out to be wrong, and that is not somethign that goes down easy.