This assertion is an out and out lie, and every person that has posted this has been shown to be a liar, yourself included. The compressinn analysis of the footprints in the Palauxy has proven each and every one that has been sectioned to be footprints. Those sections are just one example of the thousands of facts that demolish evolution and old earth nonsense.
["So far all of the purported man footprints alongside dinosaur footprints have been shown to be misinterpretations or outright fraud"]
"This assertion is an out and out lie, and every person that has posted this has been shown to be a liar, yourself included. The compressinn analysis of the footprints in the Palauxy has proven each and every one that has been sectioned to be footprints. Those sections are just one example of the thousands of facts that demolish evolution and old earth nonsense."
Since you have focused on this one point I made am I to assume you agree with everything else I said? Interesting.
Anyway, to address your claim that I am a liar and the Paluxy tracks have not been debunked, here is some information for you.
You mention compression tests done on some of those tracks, I assume you mean one of Baugh's dug up chunks of rock? Do you mean the compression test done on this 'artifact'?
Here is a very short list of articles from Talk Origins. Before you go off on some rant about how biased T.O. may be, if you do not trust their work then follow the cites they give which in most cases will eventually end up with the primary literature. All T.O. ever does is research the science and report as accurately as possible the results. They are a better source for accurate scientific knowledge than any creationist website, especially those where the Bible is considered to automatically supersede any science which contradicts it.
Here is an interesting note from one of those creationist sites you fellows seem to love and admire so much.
Answers in Genesis "Arguments we think creationists should NOT use"
Under the heading "Which arguments should definitely not be used?"
“Paluxy tracks prove that humans and dinosaurs co-existed.”
"Some prominent creationist promoters of these tracks have long since withdrawn their support. Some of the allegedly human tracks may be artifacts of erosion of dinosaur tracks obscuring the claw marks. There is a need for properly documented research on the tracks before we would use them to argue the coexistence of humans and dinosaurs. However, there is much other evidence that dinosaurs and humans coexisted—see Q&A: Dinosaurs."
Now I believe you were calling me a liar. Hmmmm, just where was I lying? Perhaps your claim that I am a liar is your own bit of prevarication?
I suggest you sleep with your pyramid hat over top of your tinfoil one tonight and increase your customary nightly Homeopathic snake oil to a full gallon. That should help you see your error in calling me a liar a little more clearly. (You might want to wear a diaper, that is a lot of water)