[Natural Law]

Why do creationists reject the possibility that God would would have used an explainable process to permit his creations to adapt to a dynamic environment?

The confounding argument to evolutionists has to do with endangered species. Creationists would have you accept that man is just another evolved species and that 99.99% of all species that ever existed are now extinct because of the inability to either adapt to changes in their environment or inability to compete with other species. Therefore if a whale and a spotted owl cannot compete with humans - screw them, they are supposed to become extinct.

[Rodney King]

Why do creationists reject the possibility that God would would have used an explainable process to permit his creations to adapt to a dynamic environment?

Because our understanding of science and nature is ever changing. People don't want an ever changing understanding of God. They want to yell "Stop! This is God. We know everything we need to know about Him."

[DungeonMaster]

Why do creationists reject the possibility that God would would have used an explainable process to permit his creations to adapt to a dynamic environment?

Because the bible is clear.