“He is not qualified to be Commander in Chief”
I second that. While he has done well on the issue of illegal immigration, he would have a very tough time getting over his past. Specifically the term limits movement/issue that got him into office and the pledge he later tossed away. And yes I have seen and read his explanation. But without even that baggage, it takes more than being a one trick pony to be presidential material.
You mean the one where when he broke the pledge he was reelected by 60 percent? Even though the Dem candidate opposing him had $711,000 to spend on a congressional campaign.
You've posted this to me three different time on three different threads over two days. You're not going to get a different reponse from me and it's starting to get old.