[ConservativeMind]

There are several things in this article that need more explanation before I sign on to what’s said.

Mr. Herring seems to leave innuendo in place of facts.

[WorkerbeeCitizen]

In places yes he does. But the basic goals of these three "incentives" are there - you can view the agreements on line.

NAFTA is already in place, signed by all involved and agreed upon.

The amnesty bill is being railroaded through the senate as we speak. Looking at the bigger picture though, these agreements are just tools and should only be looked at as such.

[unspun]

There are several things in this article that need more explanation before I sign on to what’s said. Mr. Herring seems to leave innuendo in place of facts.

In this kind of political game, by the time all the facts are neatly in place, the game is lost.

[B4Ranch]

Would you mind being more specific than, “several things in this article that need more explanation”?

First, are you looking at this situation as a continental plan involving all of North America. That’s necessary in order to see the pieces fitting into place.

Remember all the treaties and agreements that took place over the years to squeeze all the european countries into one big basket so that they could be controlled by a small group in each country? Now the people still have a voice but it’s nothing compared to what they had 25 years ago.

Look at the US as if we were 50 different small countries all looking in the same direction, as we do now, looking at Washington, DC for our national security and the protector of our national sovereignty.

The goal is to have all the countries in the entire world looking towards the United Nations for their national security and the protector of their (laugh loudly) national sovereignty.

The “free trade agreements” are what is supposed to see that everyone in the world gets their fair share while the elites get the rest.

Welcome to the New World Order