Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: littlehouse36

LOL—Show me how.


328 posted on 06/19/2007 8:59:15 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy

cpforlife said that NAU was not whacko since 11 states opposed it. How could 11 states be whacko?

I clarified that states were opposing the SPP, an official US initiative (not the NAU, a conspiracy theory.) Therefore, the states were not whacko because they are opposing a real thing.

You pointed out that there were only _resolutions_ to oppose (likely by fringe individuals like Charlie Rangoll.) Which proves the SPP even more innocuous and non-conspiratorial. A mainstream opposition would flag the SPP as a dangerous thing for the U. S.


329 posted on 06/19/2007 9:54:06 PM PDT by littlehouse36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson