Replies

I have never practiced in the sense I hung out a shingle, but have served of counsel numerous times to make arguments for the finders of fact. Before a “Arbiters of Law” (the judge) I’m lousy. Before the “Finders of Fact” (the jury) I’m damn good.

I don't know how you think you can be damn good in front of a jury, since you've never practiced law. How did you ever get in front of a jury without practicing law? Sounds like BS to me.

I would have to agree with you that in front of a judge you would be lousy. You have proven that fact by your ignoarance of the law. You think you can manipulate facts and get a bunch of ignorant civil servants to follow your logic, but you don't know the law and you don't know how to argue the law.

If you are trying to prove up a libel claim based on this letter by the Duke 88, that case will never go to trial because even if everything you allege is true in regard to the facts, the letter is still not libel and the issue will never go to a jury.

In order to be a good used car salesman, you gotta have a car. You don't have a car to sell.

>>>>I have never practiced in the sense I hung out a shingle, but have served of counsel numerous times to make arguments for the finders of fact. Before a “Arbiters of Law” (the judge) I’m lousy. Before the “Finders of Fact” (the jury) I’m damn good.

>>I don’t know how you think you can be damn good in front of a jury, since you’ve never practiced law. How did you ever get in front of a jury without practicing law? Sounds like BS to me.

I already said, I didn’t hang out shingle (opened law office) but have been retained to make oral argument. Sounds like FR (failure to read) to me.

I would have to agree with you that in front of a judge you would be lousy. You have proven that fact by your ignoarance of the law.

Ignoring what law. pray tell????

>>>>You think you can manipulate facts and get a bunch of ignorant civil servants to follow your logic, but you don’t know the law and you don’t know how to argue the law.

Gee, those juries must have been wrong. I’ll have to give my contingency fee back!

>>>>If you are trying to prove up a libel claim based on this letter by the Duke 88, that case will never go to trial because even if everything you allege is true in regard to the facts, the letter is still not libel and the issue will never go to a jury.

If you don't know how to get such a case before the jury, I pity your clients.

>> order to be a good used car salesman, you gotta have a car. You don’t have a car to sell.

Am selling a rather delightful black 2005 Lexis that was bought with contingency fee case winnings. Sell your own 91 Yugo and make me an offer.