We will have to agree to disagree.
It is easy to sit back and not demand more than an apology when it doesn’t affect your own life.
If you were a LaCrosse player from Duke, and you knew you were innocent, the ad in the paper would appear indefensible.
The truth is that those professors are a bunch of creeps who tried to help railroad innocent boys by their crappy little tactics.
I only wish that the same would happen to their carrers that has happened to Nifongs. I wonder if the Haitians would care about marxist drivel?
Look, if a lawyer wants to go for it and sue that's fine, but still no one has pointed out what it is in the statement that is worthy of civil litigation. I may be totally wrong on this, but I don't see where this statement "harms" these boys other than the regualar liberal crap spewed on a daily basis around this country.
I would love for someone to point out the justification and harm done to these boys as a result of this statement. Could the "ad" as a whole be a kin to what Nifong said in his early statements concerning this case?