Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wgflyer
Mice, rats, moles, voles, snakes, lizards, opossums and basically anything that can not be classed as cute, harmless or otherwise inoffensive.

But definitely not babies.

Does that clarify my position?

44 posted on 06/16/2007 9:23:42 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Dr.Zoidberg
Yes, and we definitely concur on the babies.

For the other, I’m not sure why “cute” disqualifies a small critter from being part of the food chain...harmless, inoffensive or otherwise. For example, there is great sentiment out in California to protect the cougars who very much consider puppies and other pets as lunch, not to mention the occasional jogger. Yet you go to jail for shooting one. Puppies, by implication, are the preferred sacrifice.

People are a funny lot.

60 posted on 06/16/2007 10:06:13 PM PDT by wgflyer (Liberalism is to society what HIV is to the immune system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson