Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(from an election law expert) Hillary Is a Felon: Just Released Tape Proves Crime
hillary project ^ | 6-15-07

Posted on 06/16/2007 1:14:47 PM PDT by doug from upland

SEE VIDEO CLIPS HERE

Hillary Is A Felon: Just Released Tape Proves Crime

In preparation for submitting the just released video of Hillary Clinton engaged in various felonies, to the California Appellate Court reviewing Hillary’s protection by California’s Anti-SLAPP law in Paul v Clinton et al., election law expert and US Supreme Court/Constitutional Lawyer John Armor determined on June 14, 2007, after analyzing the video of Hillary Clinton on a conference call with Peter Paul, Stan Lee, et al, that the video captures Hillary engaged in a series of felony violations of the law.

The videotape, with clear audio of Sen. Clinton, documents her direct knowledge and involvement with Paul in producing the Hollywood fund-raiser and indicates she participated in solicitation of entertainers, whose in-kind contributions of their services would also constitute illegal contributions exceeding $25,000. The five minute video, which will be released to the public when the Appellate Reply Brief is filed in Paul v. Hillary Clinton et al., has been reviewed and analyzed by a series of election law experts, with John Armor being selected to publicly explain his analysis of the first ever video to capture a presidential candidate committing felonies.

Below is just a small portion of the five minute video. The full video will soon be released to the public:

See also: Smoking gun tape to indict Hillary, punishable up to 5 years in prison


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; democrats; felon; hillary; hillaryclinton; hillaryscandals; peterpaul; ratcrime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: doug from upland

Yawn....


41 posted on 06/16/2007 4:47:01 PM PDT by jwh_Denver (Press 1 for English. Not me, I press 2 and say I can't speak Spanish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Doug,

Keep it up. You are fantastic. The cry babies on this site are really starting to bother me.


42 posted on 06/16/2007 5:34:56 PM PDT by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
"election law expert and US Supreme Court/Constitutional Lawyer John Armor"

FR's very own Congressman BillyBob?

43 posted on 06/16/2007 8:26:38 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

Yes.


44 posted on 06/16/2007 11:36:34 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: JosephW

I will write a separate post about this. A major lawsuit was filed on Friday or will be filed on Monday morning against Stan Lee by the newly reorganized Stan Lee Media. You will be amazed.

The bankruptcy court gave Lee the specific authority to remove several properties from the bankruptcy free and clear to develop them for the benefit of the stockholders and creditors. He signed the agreement and was supposed to transfer them to a specific company -— SLC LLC for that purpose. The company was never formed by him. A few months before the dismissal in late 2006, the debtor in possession, Junko Kobayashi, signed documents without court approval or knowledge giving title to those properties to QED Productions, a subsidiary of Stan’s new company, POW! Entertainment. I have seen copies of the documents. This is much more than just a civil matter. There is real trouble here for those involved.


45 posted on 06/16/2007 11:50:43 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Thank God for your work, Doug, and thank you! bttt


46 posted on 06/17/2007 6:44:19 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

“With the advent of this information about to break to the public”

Who will break this information? CBS or the New York Times?
(Sarcasm lamp is lit)


47 posted on 07/02/2007 7:38:09 AM PDT by Holicheese (Zap Razdowler Rules!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson