[AmericaUnited]

And in its own terms (explaining rocks and DNA) it is probably the most successful theory in the history of science.

Oh please! I would not call a theory that has had to modified again and again and again, because it was wrong, "the most successful theory in the history of science.".

Just like it depended on JUNK-DNA being true and now we know that there is no such thing. BZZZT! Try again.

[samtheman]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junk_DNA

[ndt]

"Just like it depended on JUNK-DNA being true"

No it didn't. The very definition of Junk DNA assumes that some of it might do something.

Junk DNA is "a section of DNA for which there is no known use"

You are making edits which do not exist and turing it into "a section of DNA for which there is no known use"