==Hint: ID is not even close to being a scientific theory.
Again, there is no need for ID to comprehensively explain the origin of life. If all ID does is find incidences of design in nature, that’s enough. SETI does not seek to to explain the origin of species, and yet it is considered a scientific research project. And besides, ID disproves Darwinian evolution every time it shows that design is a better explanation for any given biological phenomena.
I agree. The theory of evolution does not seek to explain the origin of life either.
If all ID does is find incidences of design in nature, that’s enough.
False! Finding design in nature is easy. Look at snowflakes! That does not prove a designer. You have a major step to fill in there.
SETI does not seek to to explain the origin of species, and yet it is considered a scientific research project.
?????? That is a pretty disconnected statement. Why should SETI explain the origin of species when the theory of evolution handles that quite well? SETI is just looking for signals of a kind that are known to associate with our own civilization, under the assumption that those signals would signify intelligent civilizations elsewhere. What does that have to do with the origin of species?
And besides, ID disproves Darwinian evolution every time it shows that design is a better explanation for any given biological phenomena.
And it has yet to come even close. ID is simply religion lite, and it's not fooling anybody.