“In many cases darwinists assume they know and then go out and teach that mislead assumption only to find that they don’t know.”
Your statement is unfair. Those who believe in evolution are the ones who made this discovery. It didn’t have anything to do with the Discovery Institute or those who support Intelligent Design. Scientists had a theory that the dna was a relic, and therefore not important. It has been disproven by the scientists who made this discovery. That is how it is supposed to work.
If the Discovery Institute had actually made this scientific discovery, I would be impressed. But I don’t know that they actually do any scientific research. It appears that they criticize the works of those doing the research, but provide little of their own scientific research data.
This results of this study are being used to criticize those who support evolution. But, those who support evolution are the ones that have done this study, made the discovery and published the results. They did not make an assumption and treat it as fact. They made an assumption, tested it scientifically, and shared the results with others. Even though the results are not what was expected, it is an advancement in science, which will be taught to students.
well that’s a good start. They should never had tried to prejudiced students minds by calling the unknown “junk dna.” That is typical of darwinists...not very honest without even knowing it. Many other holes in the evolution theory are kept out of the classroom along with the competing theories of ID and creationism. It is not that they are not valid as some very deceived minds would have us believe. THe facts prove otherwise...the darkness which has a grip on so many learned minds simply can’t stand the truth so it just tries to claim it is not science. He was always a liar from the beginning and now does his most crafty work through unwitting scientists and teachers. I am glad the evidence is so available nowadays largely through the internet.