Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: balch3

In case anyone is curious. A functional definition of Junk DNA is “a section if DNA for which no function is known”.

In other words to “predict” that some of it might do something is not a prediction at all.


5 posted on 06/16/2007 1:47:41 AM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ndt

Not really, the evo answer to the following question is: JUNK

The question: What is this apparently useless chain of DNA?

Evolutionary theory relied on this being true for 50 years now

Creationism never did.

It is another example of genuine science once again proving evolutionary science is JUNK.


8 posted on 06/16/2007 3:21:30 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8...down to 3..GWB, we hardly knew ye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ndt

then why has it been labeled junk? Now scientists are seeing that there is some function to that part of the dna. In many cases darwinists assume they know and then go out and teach that mislead assumption only to find that they don’t know. Some of the trully most stupid people are those who think they know so much and it has become a way to deny their wordless conscience.


33 posted on 06/16/2007 9:30:46 AM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson