Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/14/2007 11:13:11 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: stainlessbanner

Anything that White people do.


2 posted on 06/14/2007 11:14:59 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

from the article:
"In 2005, there were more than 645,000 victims of cross-racial violent crimes between blacks and whites in the U.S. In 90 percent of those crimes, black offenders attacked white victims."

3 posted on 06/14/2007 11:15:31 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Here's a CNN video clip about the murders [YouTube]

The NAACP representative says thinks it occurred in Cincinnati (instead of Knoxville)

4 posted on 06/14/2007 11:20:40 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stainlessbanner

I know what a hate crime is, it’s stupid, and at its best is moronic symbolism and multi-culturalism run a muck. If you kill me or take a crap on my lawn, I am going to apply some logic and guess you didn’t do it because you liked me. If you did it because I was NDN or whatever, I couldn’t care less. All I want is for you to be brought to justice for killing me or hope that I have my mini-14 handy the next time you take a crap on my lawn.


7 posted on 06/15/2007 1:27:51 AM PDT by WildcatClan (Duncan Hunter '08 'Doing the jobs Americans aren't willing to do.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stainlessbanner

I still cannot believe what those animals did to Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom has had no coverage in the MSM.


8 posted on 06/15/2007 1:37:06 AM PDT by youngamerecan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stainlessbanner

A hate crime must be a crime which is neither a love crime or an indifference crime.


10 posted on 06/15/2007 2:08:47 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stainlessbanner
"If this [Knoxville case] had been white on black crime, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson and their ilk would have descended on Knoxville like a swarm of angry bees,"

Lack of rabble rousers. That's the reason. Don'tcha know that news is just entertainment in disguise.

11 posted on 06/15/2007 2:10:34 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stainlessbanner
Hate Crime is ThoughtCrime.

Remember: once you make a particular Thought a crime, or even an "aggravating factor" in another more active crime (like rape), and claim to be able to determine its existence at trial, any unpopular thought can be criminalized.

Hence Orwell's 1984, which apparently doesn't get read or taken seriously any more, perhaps because the "prophecy" was "wrong" (or just ahead of schedule).

12 posted on 06/15/2007 2:19:57 AM PDT by ExGeeEye (Any means, fair or foul, to defeat the islamic filth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stainlessbanner

I don’t think the replies in this thread address the issue correctly.

While assault, battery, murder, whatever, should be treated equally in all circumstances, hates crimes are a different breed.

As I understand it, a hate crime is terrorism against a particular group - an act designed to intimidate and cause fear against a whole class of people. While the hate crimes laws may not be applied perfectly, it’s understandable why attempts are being made to curtail these actions.

The arguments made by other posters are simply that they give groups special “rights”. I don’t buy that. In order to show an action was terrorism against a group, the criminal act must be shown to reinforce a reasonable, preexisting perception of ferocity - like a “I could be next” - in the entire victim class.

For example, a serial murderer who goes after skinny people only because he *hates* skinny people would not typically be considered a hate crime because, in general, skinny people do not feel persecuted or threatened.

On the other hand, a member of the gay community - which already has a higher rate of being murder victims and is continually condemned for who they are by entire religions, governments, and neighborhoods - who is murdered for being what they are is a different crime. It can reignite fear in an entire group of people and could easily be considered terrorism.

*flame suit on*


13 posted on 06/15/2007 3:00:10 AM PDT by UndauntedR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stainlessbanner

The entire concept of “Hate” crime is stupid. It is a socialist-liberal invention to exagerate a crime’s impact for more sensational media coverage. The crime is the crime. Murder carries with it the highest punishment anyway. Hate crime is just a media defination that has been perverted into a crime exaggerator by liberals with the power to vote and make themselves feel good.


14 posted on 06/15/2007 3:08:59 AM PDT by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stainlessbanner

A good example of a hate crime: passing legislation which considers crimes against Democrat voting blocs to be more serious than crimes against non-Democrat voting blocs.


17 posted on 06/15/2007 4:18:18 AM PDT by Jack Wilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stainlessbanner

A hate crime is whatever the libs don’t want conservatives to do. Of course, a minority or jihadist can’t commmit such a crime.


20 posted on 06/15/2007 4:32:21 AM PDT by mathluv (Never Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stainlessbanner

Anyone who asks what is a hate crime, or questions the validity of hate crime as a type of criminality, has committed a hate crime. I’ve reported this author to the PC police.


21 posted on 06/15/2007 4:37:08 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (DemocraticUnderground.com is an internet hate site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stainlessbanner

Hate crime laws were created ONLY to give White Christian males more prison time for crimes that they commit against non-Whites, non-Christians and women. Prosecutors and police in EVERY state know this and always comply.


22 posted on 06/15/2007 4:49:55 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stainlessbanner

A hate crime is defined as an action that requires establishment of Federal police.


28 posted on 06/15/2007 8:21:55 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stainlessbanner
I've never believed in hate crimes and still don't.

It doesn't matter what the case is, whether its these two poor victims in this Tennessee case or anyone else victimized by whatever crime, the perpetrator certainly does not perform his actions based on love. The maximum penalty issued by our society is a relatively painless lethal injection. This is enough to eradicate the scum who did this.

What are we to do? Legally acknowledge what is already obvious to anyone with eyes? These two were victims of hatred. Hatred itself is not a crime. The statutes currently on the books are sufficient to punish the guilty. We don't need to execute them twice because of what these savages were thinking. We shouldn't care what was going through their tiny little minds as they were doing this. We're above them and we soil our own brains by trying to dissect their motives. What they did was enough for us to judge them savages and a danger to our society. They should be killed with all due process and speed. Hate legislation is not necessary.
38 posted on 06/15/2007 4:37:44 PM PDT by Live free or die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson