Okaaay then correct me with your Paki embassy logic. LOL!
BTW whats "dsistorted"? Was English a second language in your Madrassa (the first language being terrorism) or do you come from a country where they speak "dsistorted" English?
“Tehre was only one choice: vote (under Inidna auspices) or let others choose their oppressors for them. “
Others who? I dont see Biharis coming and voting in Kashmiri elections. The others are Kashmiris themselves. Either way they made the choice. Nobody forced them to vote. BTW India is spelt as I-N-D-I-A not I-N-I-D-N-A. The Pakis must be really on low budget to hire you.
“Voting in an election under the de facto authority does not mean that you chose that authority, and you know it.”
Who chooses then? Please tell me who is choosing the government in Kashmir? Excuse this is Indian election, not your Paki election where the Paki-Punjabi-Army establishment chooses the Prime Minister of the so-called “Azad(free) Kashmir”. Its the “Azad(free) Kashmir” that needs the plebiscite. By the way “plebiscite” is a UN demand, so now you are a UN boot licker punk huh?
” So India and its sycophants twist elections held under the occupying authority into the same thing.”
Another of your low budget Ptv propaganda.
BTW Puerto Rico and Quebec are not Kashmir. Kashmir is just like any other state of India, it is, was and shall always be part of India. All states in India was under Hindu or Muslims rule at one point of time. The idea of Pakistan itself was imposed on the Hindus and Moslems by the Brits and one single party the Muslim league. Secular, democratic India is one of the greatest example in history of a truly free, pluralistic, diverse and democratic republic that outshines some of the best examples of democracies of the west. Only you have a problem of digesting the fact. You would rather have India be a third world hell-hole like the Africas so that you can sustain western, white, supremacy over them. Only India stands in your way and has real the potential in future to outclass the west. Face the reality dude.
“Not to mention letting any of the other national groups within Indian’s artficial borders have a free and fair vote, which is what democracies do, BTW.”
Prove it buddy. Prove something at least for once.
BTW even UN, US and EU monitors have attested to the free and fairness of the Kashmiri (and Indian) election. You Paki clowns have trouble digesting it.
Unless you happen to be a minority, such as a Christian, Sikh, Kashmiri, Gujarati, Assaese, Bodo, Dalit, Manipuri, Tamil, etc., etc., etc. For the minorities, as Rep. Dana Rohrabacher noted, "India might as well be Nazi Germany."
Your precious Hinutva has been exposed and the collapse has begun. You just don't realize it yet. A few years from now, it may well be that neither India nor Pakistan will exist as we know it today. And that would enable a lot more people in South Asia to enjoy a lot more freedom.
Except, of course, that it was forced under India's umbrella, denied the choice that most of the other states/provinces/entities made, and it is now given no alternative but Indian rule.
Quebec is a province of Canada, the same status that Kashmir currently has. Unlike Kashmir, it has been given the opportunity to choose its status in a free and fair vote. (Independence came within a hair of winning.) Why can't a country that loudly proclaims itself "the world's largest democracy" do for the Kashmiris (and the other minority nations within its borders) what the Canadians did for Quebec?
How would simply having a plebiscite hurt India? Or are you that afraid of losing?
Which is an irrelevancy, as you know. Those elections only allow the vote to occur within a framework of Indian rule. They do not allow teh people to choose whether they want to continue Indian rule, even though the Kashmiris were promised that in 1948!!!