Posted on 06/14/2007 3:55:45 PM PDT by Alaphiah123
Key senators tentatively agreed on a plan to revive a stalled immigration bill on Thursday, aided by President Bush's support for a quick $4.4 billion aimed at "securing our borders and enforcing our laws at the work site."
Officials who spoke on condition of anonymity said Republican and Democratic supporters of the bill were presenting their proposal to the Senate's top two leaders, who in turn arranged an early evening meeting to discuss it.
Precise details to be presented to Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., were not disclosed.
In general, according to officials familiar with the discussions, Republicans and Democrats would each be accorded roughly a dozen chances to amend the measure, with the hope that they would then combine to provide the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster by die-hard opponents. The officials who described the emerging plan did so on condition of anonymity, saying the negotiations had been conducted in private.
The legislation has generated intense controversy, particularly for provisions envisioning eventual citizenship for many of the estimated 12 million immigrants now in the country unlawfully. The bill also calls for greater border security and a crackdown on the hiring of illegal employees.
"We're going to show the American people that the promises in this bill will be kept," Bush said, two days after launching a personal rescue mission.
Any agreement is subject to approval by Reid, who has said repeatedly it is up to Bush and Republicans to line up the votes needed to advance the measure if it is to be brought back to the Senate for debate. Reid, who has expressed misgivings about elements of the bill, sidetracked it last week after supporters gained only 45 of the 60 votes needed.
Republicans accounted for only seven of the 45 votes, and Reid said earlier this week, "We'll move on to immigration when they have their own act together."
Bush's decision to personally announce support for the accelerated funding reflected concerns expressed by Republican senators at a closed-door meeting on Tuesday. Several told him their constituents doubted the government was capable of following through on a commitment to enforce immigration laws.
In a letter sent to Bush before the meeting, Georgia Republican Sens. Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson wrote, "This lack of trust is rooted in the mistakes made in 1986, and the continued chaos surrounding our immigration laws. Understandably, the lack of credibility the federal government has on this issue gives merit to the skepticism of many about future immigration reform."
Under the legislation as drafted, money for border enforcement would be collected gradually as illegal immigrants pay the fines and fees needed to achieve legal status. The letter asked Bush to secure the border before other elements of the immigration measure go into effect, and the president agreed in his remarks to the Associated Builders and Contractors.
"One common concern is whether the government will provide the resources to meet the goals in the bill. They say, 'It's fine to talk about it, are you actually going to do something?'" he said.
"To answer these concerns I support an amendment that will provide $4.4 billion in immediate additional funding for securing our borders and enforcing our laws at the work site," he said.
"By matching our benchmarks with these critical funds, we're going to show the American people that the promises in this bill will be kept."
Two Republican supporters of the legislation, Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Jon Kyl of Arizona, had previously proposed advanced funding.
"The moment the presidential signing pen meets the paper these funds will be available," Graham said in a statement welcoming Bush's remarks.
But Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., an opponent of the legislation, took a different view. "I appreciate the effort to fund border security, but there's simply no reason why we should be forced to tie amnesty to it. If the administration was serious about fulfilling the border security promises, then this funding should have been supported all along, not offered at the last minute to attract votes to a bad bill."
Even a decision to return the bill to the Senate floor does not guarantee its passage, given the intense opposition. "We've got people out there on both sides really ready to burn the place down," said Sen. Trent Lott of Mississippi, the second-ranking Republican. "I don't think we ought to let that happen."
The calendar, too, presents obstacles to any attempt to pass the measure before the Senate begins a scheduled vacation in two weeks. Should they choose, critics of the immigration measure could slow progress on other measures Reid wants debated in the next two weeks. The effect would be to further reduce prospects for passage of the immigration bill.
Let's get our local office holders to start calling the Senators too.
Print and send to the every Republican in a state and municipal office with a note that there will be no further contributions until we get a fence BUILT and DEFENDED on our border with Mexico.
Please send this idea out to your ping lists.
The Democrats are ALL SILENT on this issue.....it’s only Republicans that are divided......hey Pubbies....THAT should tell you something....KILL THIS AMNESTY CRAP!
We should thank God GWB is leading the fight for the pro-amnesty crowd!
LIES!!
Maybe we ought to mail our congresscritters some bricks, to help them get started on the wall.
I’ll be calling all morning.
I’ve read all of today’s stories on this, and there are two schools of thought:
1). $4.4 billion for “increased border enforcement” (http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2007/06/bush_hopes_prop.html)
2). The rhetoric of the 12 million-plus “hard working, peaceful illegals” who illegally entered the country for no other reason than a better life, the illegals who “deserve” their piece of the American dream...
I’d like to go for increased border security and treating lawbreakers like lawbreakers. What’s so difficult about that? What part of “NO AMNESTY” does President Bush NOT understand?
History does repeat,after all.
God help us.
I’m with you on all those things. Wish the White House or at least Tony Snow read FR.
This will not go unanswered..
sw
Take a look at #102 and tell me if these people might be more interested in our decision to cut our donations to their campaigns.
This has become a dictatorship.
The White House not only reads FR, Rove’s minions post messages!
He knows the pulse of the GOP is right here. He reads us daily. Count on it.
sw
First, send back the illegals.
Then, build a seriously imposing wall.
Some guy named Silveira or Duffy wrote “The Coming American Dictatorship”;I seem to remember he thought fascism would be the type of government forced on us.
I know he WAS a freeper......something has happened to him in the White House. if he still had his radio show, he would be on OUR side....the side of common sense and LAW AND ORDER!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.