Hmm, yes, because liberals have never been known to state the obvious once or twice in their lifetime. I suppose I should go re-read Arnold's latest statements that using Spanish speaking mediums discourages leaning the English language then. Clearly my interpretation of that must be off, since he is a liberal.
And when Fineman notes it is boneheaded for a President with low approval ratings to engage in an ultimate fighting bout with his own base, well, clearly my non thinking self should have re-read the article multiple times rather then agree with him. Though the truth of the matter is that these liberals came to these conclusions AFTER conservatives did and reacted. After all, it was the reaction of conservatives that led to their action of comment. I'm not agreeing with, so much as they chose to agree with conservatives.
Yes, we agree on the bill being bad. We don't agree on the President's intent, nor do we agree differing from the opinion of the pack necessarily makes you right.
FreeReign:That alone should make a thinking person go back a read the quote.
Hmm, yes, because liberals have never been known to state the obvious once or twice in their lifetime. I suppose I should go re-read Arnold's latest statements that using Spanish speaking mediums discourages leaning the English language then. Clearly my interpretation of that must be off, since he is a liberal.
There you go again.
I never said that just because a liberal says something, that it must not be true. Now you misrepresent what I've said.
Again I urge you to read the full context of the President's "what's best for the country" comment. And of course liberals are going to want to take it out of context. They want us to run from Al Qaeda in Iraq and they will use anything they can against the President.
Yes, we agree on the bill being bad.
I think we should quit while we agree.