I was responding to someone that said there was no enforcement. When I pointed out that enforcement had increased substantially, which is a fact, they then said "well, then how many have come back across the border". That is what I meant by what-ifs, they are presenting scenarios which had no bearing on the facts I presented to their assertion that there was no enforcement.
Y'all are getting so deranged about this that you can't discuss the issue in a civilized manner and choose to ignore facts when presented. Take a frigging chill pill.
You are irrational. I called the illegal invaders the enemy. If that means you, I had no idea. I only knew you were spinning for them. I didn’t know you considered yourself one of them.
You seem to have a problem telling the difference between fact and fantasy. Do not tell me that the crimes committed against me by your fellow criminals are not a fact. (You identified yourself as the enemy I referred to, so if you didn’t mean it, feel free to retract your confession).
Whether you meant to or not, you answered my question. You do have a different standard of treatment for yourself than you have for those of who must shoulder the cost of the crimes you defend. Thank for being so candid.
The issue of illegals re-entering illegally after being deported is not a “what if” at all. Most illegals are apprehended numerous times- most simply return within hours or days of being deported. That is why securing the border has to be the first step of any solution to the border problems. As long as the border is not secure, it really doesn’t matter how many are apprehended or deported since they don’t tend to stay deported.