[ndt]

"I don’t understand what you are saying. It seems to me, that is EXACTLY what happens in a beaker."

Only if you put bounds on the statement as you did by specifying a particular set up (saturated solution etc).

"I tend to believe that increased CO2 levels is an Effect of warming rather than its cause."

To some degree that is true, as in the case of melting and subsequent decomposing of permafrost for example.

"The tendency for gases to come out of solutions as they are heated is a much more powerfully linked phenomenon than CO2’s effect as a greenhouse gas."

Debatable. My point was however what you just agreed to, C02 is a green house gas. The argument is not does it, it clearly does. The question is, is it enough to matter?

[the final gentleman]

I dunno, ndt, UnChainged seems to have won the semantical point. Paleo-measurements support his contention.

Maybe you have some other postulate to offer...?