I WAS TALKING ABOUT DAVE MAYNOR.
Apple didn’t act that way towards him.
There are plenty of Apple sploits out there. I provided a bunch of links.
If you want to keep changing the subject, do it with someone else.
The debate isn’t whether Apple has vulnerabilities that require patching. It’s about whether Apple has publicly denied vulnerabilities that they later patched.
You haven’t posted support for that claim yet. You gave one man’s unquoted claim as reported by PC Mag, but if you think you can support your claim that Apple has done that lots of time by just that one unsourced note, you’re mistaken.
The debate isn’t whether Apple has vulnerabilities that require patching. It’s about whether Apple has publicly denied vulnerabilities that they later patched.
You haven’t posted support for that claim yet. You gave one man’s unquoted claim as reported by PC Mag, but if you think you can support your claim that Apple has done that lots of time by just that one unsourced note, you’re mistaken.