Skip to comments.
GA Senators got the message; THEY SENT THE (IMMIGRATION) MESSAGE TO BUSH!
Senator Chambliss Email Response ^
| This week
| S. Chambliss & J. Isakson
Posted on 06/13/2007 1:39:27 PM PDT by Wings-n-Wind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Essence of Saxby's return email of this week...
[Emphasis added!]
To: Wings-n-Wind
Not good enough. Who knows what would be done with the money. Build the fence and then we will talk.
2
posted on
06/13/2007 1:43:38 PM PDT
by
CindyDawg
To: Wings-n-Wind
Thank you Georgia Senators....falling on the deaf ears of our President.....I really like GW in so many others ways, but his stand on immigration is a frustration for me.
3
posted on
06/13/2007 1:43:45 PM PDT
by
Kimmers
(Where is Hispania ?)
To: Wings-n-Wind
...the message from a majority of Georgians is that they have no trust that the United States Government will enforce the laws contained in this new legislation and secure the border first. This lack of trust is rooted in the mistakes made in 1986 and the continued chaos surrounding our immigration laws. BINGO. Thanks for the post.
4
posted on
06/13/2007 1:43:51 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Why do open border lobbies push for amnesty while borders leak like sieves? (hint: new dem voters))
To: Wings-n-Wind
Oops; forgot to tell you thanks for the post. It is nice to know some Senators are taking a stand....unlike mine (Lugar)
5
posted on
06/13/2007 1:45:25 PM PDT
by
Kimmers
(Where is Hispania ?)
To: Wings-n-Wind
as well as any outstanding existing authorizations. Does this include the Hunter fence? If not, no deal.
6
posted on
06/13/2007 1:46:10 PM PDT
by
ovrtaxt
(THOMPSON NEEDS TO CLARIFY HIS POSITION ON THE SPP BEFORE I SUPPORT HIM.)
To: CindyDawg
I’m with you. I don’t see any reason to trust them.
7
posted on
06/13/2007 1:46:53 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: Wings-n-Wind; All
As someone pointed out to me yesterday, this part of the statement:
“contained in legislation currently pending in the Senate”...
is problematic. I do think they’re both backing off, however.
8
posted on
06/13/2007 1:50:03 PM PDT
by
Baladas
To: CindyDawg
Not good enough indeed. I expect the WH is huddling with Uncle Teddy right now contriving some bogus 'trigger' ostensibly indicating border security goals have been met (likely in the next month or two)that will give him cover to enact his coveted comprehensive reform.
The only true way of determining the effectiveness of any border control plan is YEARS of effective implementation.
Problem is, W & the Dems don't wanna wait that long.
9
posted on
06/13/2007 1:50:21 PM PDT
by
skeeter
To: Wings-n-Wind
“To that end, we believe that you and your administration could alleviate many of the fears of our constituents...” Those are the weenie words. Not “secure the border first,” but “throw some crumbs to the dumb peons who are complaining.” These guys are just trying to cover their own butts and trying to explain their own votes. Someone’s staffer is too clever by half.
10
posted on
06/13/2007 1:53:09 PM PDT
by
3AngelaD
(They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
To: Wings-n-Wind
So far, my tires have not been slashed as I ride around with my “Stop Illegal Immigration” and “Secure Our Borders” bumper stickers through areas thick with illegals. I’ll be adding “Can You Afford Another Anchor Baby?” to the window shortly.
11
posted on
06/13/2007 1:53:24 PM PDT
by
Melinda
To: CindyDawg
Even building the fence is not enough...
They have to show that they are willing and able to stop the illegal entries. Until they demonstrate this, nobody is going to buy their promises.
12
posted on
06/13/2007 1:53:40 PM PDT
by
aquila48
To: Wings-n-Wind
To that end, we believe that you and your administration could alleviate many of the fears of our constituents by calling for an emergency supplemental bill to fully fund the border and interior security initiatives contained in legislation currently pending in the Senate, as well as any outstanding existing authorizations. Such a move would show your commitment to securing the border first and to stopping the flow of illegal immigrants and drugs into our nation.All of which doesn't mean squat, just build the damn fence, and start jailing the non farm workers and the people that hire them.
13
posted on
06/13/2007 1:55:21 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: 3AngelaD
To that end, we believe that you and your administration could alleviate many of the fears of our constituents... Those are the weenie words. Not secure the border first, but throw some crumbs to the dumb peons who are complaining. These guys are just trying to cover their own butts and trying to explain their own votes. Someones staffer is too clever by half.True
14
posted on
06/13/2007 1:57:16 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: Wings-n-Wind
Such a move would show your commitment to securing the border first and to stopping the flow of illegal immigrants and drugs into our nation. Not mentioned are other small items like dirty bombs, suitcase nukes, poison gas cannisters etc. It's a question of when (not if) a terrorist attack happens from across the wide open borders.
15
posted on
06/13/2007 1:57:49 PM PDT
by
OSHA
(Liberals will lick the boot on their necks if they think the other boot is on yours and mine.)
To: CindyDawg
Yes, simply build the fence. Show your loyalty to Americans first Mr. President. Build the fence to protect us first. Then follow the existing laws. Deport the illegals I don’t care HOW MANY YEARS IT TAKES...JUST DO IT.
To: Wings-n-Wind
To that end, we believe that you and your administration could alleviate many of the fears of our constituents by calling for an emergency supplemental bill to fully fund the border and interior security initiatives contained in legislation currently pending in the Senate,... They still don't get it. The government needs to be output-oriented - i.e., we want to see RESULTS - input (i.e., funding) means nothing until it is implemented properly.
To: Kimmers
They aren’t taking a stand on anything except their freeloader positions in DC. This is smoke and pablum for the masses who would believe them. Note they want to move ahead with a supplemental funding for security without mentioning the previous fundings and laws and measures and amnesties that we have all has foisted on us. They wanted this quick to short circuit some of the toughest laws in the country coming to GA next month. If the mexs are all legal, then the measures passed here are meaningless and the LARGE ag and poultry industry are safe.
18
posted on
06/13/2007 2:10:40 PM PDT
by
doodad
To: Wings-n-Wind
They have already changed their minds. The bill may be palatable to them now....if enough pork is attached.
19
posted on
06/13/2007 2:17:01 PM PDT
by
sheana
To: Wings-n-Wind
y calling for an emergency supplemental bill to fully fund the border and interior security initiatives contained in legislation currently pending in the Senate You failed to bold the most important aspect of this, and it's very telling. Emergency supplemental bills cannot be filibustered, I understand, and in this instance, one is being sought to fund that stinking fraud that is currently in the Senate.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson