To: presidio9
10 posted on
06/13/2007 8:41:32 AM PDT by
ASA Vet
(Pray for the deliberately ignorant.)
To: ASA Vet
Two days ago it was "doubt" and now it's "reject." It evolved?
15 posted on
06/13/2007 8:47:26 AM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: ASA Vet
Good catch. It’s an important distinction. “Rejecting” presupposes its truth while “doubting” questions the sufficiency of the evidence.
51 posted on
06/13/2007 9:41:40 AM PDT by
almcbean
To: ASA Vet
Two days ago it was "doubt" and now it's "reject." In 2 weeks, the headline will be, "Republicans believe that "Evolutionists" should be burned at the stake as heretics."
Mark
88 posted on
06/13/2007 12:39:15 PM PDT by
MarkL
(Environmental heretics should be burned at the stake, in a "Carbon Neutral" way...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson