Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/12/2007 10:00:22 PM PDT by gpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: gpapa

He was too hard core for this administration. He wanted to actually fight a real war and wasn’t the average political careerist. Now we have a Navy ADMIRAL in charge of a dominately ground war. Makes a whole lot of sense. We have lost this one folks.


2 posted on 06/12/2007 10:02:36 PM PDT by GideonOfWar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gpapa

He was let go, becasue he had balls and gumption.....

Meadow Muffin


3 posted on 06/12/2007 10:04:55 PM PDT by rwgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gpapa

Am I the only person who finds it ironic that while the majority of fighting going on in Afghanistan and Iraq are being fought by the Army and Marines, of the 9 top military combat commands they only have 3 posts?


4 posted on 06/12/2007 10:07:28 PM PDT by SoldierMedic (Rowan Walter, 23 Feb 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gpapa
As the highly qualified, deeply respected Pace is being ushered out the door, it is reasonable to wonder why.

Because that cowardly scumbag Bush is already assisting the Hillary campaign with the transition.

Sen. Clinton has a way of getting senior men of both parties to do her work for her. Pre-emptive removal of Gen. Pace excuses candidate Clinton of the responsibility to vote for or against re-confirmation. As a bonus, Hillary and other feminist senators get to vote for a liberal admiral, CNO Mike Mullen, an ardent advocate of “diversity” quotas and other controversial goals for the military.

6 posted on 06/12/2007 10:12:35 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson