“Good morning - He never answered me anyway CM - pfffft”
I think she? might be on a different schedule. Good questions should be answered though...I’ve had a couple skipped over.
We got straightened out - all is wel.
I am trying to see who didn’t answer whom?
I’d understood from post 500 that the question was prove that enforcement is credible, which I’d mentioned Moose4’s answer several times in this thread and also noted, but can’t recall which thread, that the R’s (other than Lott) are seeking more assurances of enforcement.
But separating into two bills is a possibility if enough R’s and a few D’s can agree.