When a candidate reverses his stance on a position, as Romney has on abortion, etc., that's good. That's what we want. It's bizzare how many fail to understand -- we want to change minds, now don't we?
When a candidate is adamant on his perverse positions, however, and when they're of such magnitude, it hurts the cause to vote for him because of the (hypocritical) "R" beside his name.
Go Romney!
I don't anticipate voting for Giuliani, ever (and don't anticipate that Hobson's choice, anyway).
Yes, we do. I am just very suspicious that he changed them just before running for the presidency. I’m a Mormon convert, and I wonder how you could grow up in the church, and wait this long to change your mind on abortion. I’m a former lib, myself, and until the day I first held my son in my arms, I was pro-choice,i.e., pro-abortion-on-demand, too. I understand about life-changing events, and even maturing over time. I most certainly did. I’m just very, VERY, suspicious.
If he truly has changed his stance, on this and the 2nd Amendment (and I understand that in MA, he couldn’t have gotten elected without some anti-RKBA position) I could live with his election. I’m just not voting for him in the primary. If he’s the only choice for president in the actual election, I will hold my nose while I vote.