Y'all heard it from Joseph Farah. He never liked Bush to begin with and so he has named his choices. Personally, I think they're good ones. Let's hope conservatives rally around ONE of the conservative candidates now running for the Republican Party's nomination for President.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
To: goldstategop
So basically “It doesn’t matter anyway, it’s not like the President can really do anything. *shrug* I guess Thompson’s all right.” Just the kind of enthusiasm we need. This guy is on OUR side?
2 posted on
06/12/2007 1:42:36 AM PDT by
FremontLives
(If I must choose between righteousness and peace, I choose righteousness- Theodore Roosevelt)
To: goldstategop
OK, but from a political perspective if not from personal trust, I would sure vote for Romney, or all but Giuliani vs. the Democrats.
3 posted on
06/12/2007 1:46:32 AM PDT by
unspun
(What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
To: goldstategop
Fred Thompson/John Bolton 2008
4 posted on
06/12/2007 1:53:09 AM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(Fred Thompson/John Bolton 2008)
To: goldstategop
Tom Tancredo is a loyal conservative... but even he knows he's not presidential material. He's on a mission to focus the voters attention on the illegal-invasion and the mortal danger it poses to the Republic. Brownback is conservative... but he's clueless on Iraq/Islamism and he's also gung-ho for amnesty. IMO, he's right down there with McCain and Giuliani but for completely different reasons.
As for the rest, Hunter is the best candidate... followed by Romney. If Thompson runs... that'll give us three to choose from.
5 posted on
06/12/2007 3:15:19 AM PDT by
johnny7
("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
To: goldstategop
I think Senator Thompson is the best choice for the Republicans and the country in 2008.
However, how do I reconcile that with the fact that Joseph Farah, a certified nutbar supports him?
I guess Joe’s fever broke long enough for him to have a moment of lucidity before slipping back into his delusions of mediocrity...
9 posted on
06/12/2007 7:29:10 AM PDT by
GreenLanternCorps
(Past the schoolhouse / Take it slow / Let the little / Shavers grow / BURMA-SHAVE)
To: goldstategop
Paul is so dead wrong about the real threat of Islamo-fascism to the security of our nation he has rendered his otherwise impeccable congressional voting record irrelevant.That's right Joe. Republicans have put their faith in Wilsonian adventurism. Anyone that speaks out against that must be wrong no matter how valid their statements when compared to historical data.
11 posted on
06/12/2007 7:47:53 AM PDT by
billbears
(Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
To: arnoldpalmerfan; M203M4; Millee; EternalVigilance; rodguy911; Reaganwuzthebest; NapkinUser; Nuc1; ..
FWIW
![](http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a75/mommado/tancredopingflat.jpg)
What sets Tancredo apart from the other GOP candidates:
I think that the fact that I have the most consistent record on immigration, along with the most consistent record on conservative issues in general. That is, Sen. Brownback has certainly been consistent on the life issue. But if you put everything togetherfiscal along with social issues, then I would come out with the most consistently conservative background.
- Tom Tancredo
Click for more on Tancredo on the issues.
Join TEAM TANCREDO
FREEPMAIL ME TO BE ADDED TO THIS TANCREDO 08 PING LIST
16 posted on
06/12/2007 2:03:51 PM PDT by
SittinYonder
(Ic þæt gehate, þæt ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille furðor gan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson