Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: weegee
Those sexually procative and promiscous teens are also taking digital photos.

Seriously what does that have to do with the ruling. The ruling was based on the act. I'm not saying the act was right, and if I was the girl's father I may want to enact a little friendly reminder from my fist. But I don't think the young man committed a crime as outlined by the law and deserved 10 years in jail.

And apparently neither did the state legislature as they changed the law.

84 posted on 06/11/2007 12:02:29 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: billbears

“... I don’t think the young man committed a crime as outlined by the law ...”

The girl was 15; the age of consent for sexual activity in Georgia is 16; therefore, the young man was guilty of statutory rape, under Georgia law.

“... and deserved 10 years in jail.”

Here, I agree - the sentence seems excessive to me.


129 posted on 06/11/2007 12:35:49 PM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: billbears

So you’d take it out on the boy? What about the girl? What if it were your daughter?


245 posted on 06/11/2007 2:38:17 PM PDT by Jaded ("I have a mustard- seed; and I am not afraid to use it."- Joseph Ratzinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson