Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Millers Cave
The operative word, of course, is "Law." Judges are not kings. There was no finding that the punishment was cruel or unusual; the judge decided, in effect, that the law didn't make sense to him. That what liberals do.

Legislatures make laws, judges conduct trials and hand out sentences based upon law. The system for which you advocate sounds much more like Sharia than the one we have...and I support. Only under Sharia is a judge prosecutor, judge, jury, and executioner. We separate the functions.

If you don't like the law, change it...

134 posted on 06/11/2007 12:41:52 PM PDT by gogeo (Democrats want to support the troops without actually being helpful to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: gogeo

Its amazing how the law is being ignored here when constantly I see threads complaining about judges legislating from the bench.

I guess it depends on the case?


137 posted on 06/11/2007 12:44:31 PM PDT by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

To: gogeo
From the article: Judge Wilson agreed the 10-year prison sentence "would be viewed by society as 'cruel and unusual' in the Constitutional sense of disproportionality."

I don't think the judge was out of line at all.

191 posted on 06/11/2007 1:49:49 PM PDT by Millers Cave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson