Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: processing please hold
I'm suprised to hear that the Navy supports this. Why?

-Eric

6 posted on 06/11/2007 9:33:47 AM PDT by E Rocc (Myspace "Freepers" group moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: E Rocc

Who is in charge of the Navy?


9 posted on 06/11/2007 9:36:05 AM PDT by ConservativeDude (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc
I'm suprised to hear that the Navy supports this. Why?

The Navy can't take another position than the President's. It's a ruse. The President gets people to support the treaty because "the Navy supports it." But there is no way the Navy could come out against it.

30 posted on 06/11/2007 9:54:23 AM PDT by Barney Gumble (A liberal is someone too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc

From Phylis Schafley:

Bush apparently expects conservatives to be mollified by the argument that the Navy supports the treaty. But conservatives are smart enough to know that it’s impossible for the Navy to oppose the commander in chief’s position.


48 posted on 06/11/2007 10:22:27 AM PDT by Greg F (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson