“Giuliani candidacy IS unacceptable to pro-life voters”
But a President Hillary or Obama Is OK?
The next president will probably be picking at least 2 Supreme Court Justices.
Same old straw man argument. Fred Thompson not only can win pro-life voters, he can also win the general election against either Obama or Hillary.
Not if they're Meir'ed in controversy....
And we have every reason to believe that Rudy's choices would be every bit as liberal as Hillary's or Obama's.
As has been said many times, now is the time to be sure our choice is NOT between Hillary and Rudi, because the media is being soft on rudi right now. They won’t be if he is the nominee and there is too much baggage there for him to beat Hillary.
Rudy believes abortion is a Constitutional right. Therefore, to Rudy, overturning Roe v. Wade amounts to judicial activism. When he says he'll nominate strict constitutionalists, it means he'll nominate pro-abortion judges.
President Giuliani guarantees 8 years of pro-abortion SCOTUS nominations. President Obama or President Clinton gives us a chance to elect a pro-life President in 2012. Plus, as GWB showed us, it is very hard politically to oppose a President from your own party. It will be very difficult to block the appointment of a pro-abortion judge nominated by Rudy. It won't be as difficult to do the same if the pro-abortion judge is nominated by a Democrat.
““Giuliani candidacy IS unacceptable to pro-life voters”
But a President Hillary or Obama Is OK?”
That argument is as foolish as saying that we all have to become democrats and vote for Hillary to stop the bad event of President Obama happening.
Rudy isn’t just bad on abortion, he is a pro ‘sanctuary city’ guy on immigration... he is very bad on immigration, on gun rights, on abortion, on family (pro-gay rights anti-FMA). On domestic issues in the 199s0, he thought Clinton was doing a fine job.
he has no special skill nor insight in fighting the GWOT.
His background is as a prosecutor, and he’d make a good head of FBI. That’s it.
... and on Judges, his debate #1 response was telling: He thinks a good constitutional judge could uphold Roe v Wade.
Consider immigration:
“I believe the anti-immigration movement in America is one of our most serious public problems.” — Rudy Giuliani, Oct. 10, 1996.
http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/2007/05/23/rudy-the-mayor-of-sanctuary-city/
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/002011.htm
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1782954/posts
http://lonewacko.com/blog/archives/005877.html
Rudy’s nomination would destroy the GOP.
It would be a lose/lose for conservatives on Nov 2008.
“The next president will probably be picking at least 2 Supreme Court Justices.”
The fact that in debate #1 Rudy basically said he thought a pro-Constitutional Justice could uphold Roe v Wade, and the fact that Rudy has touted the horrible Justice Ginsberg as an example of an acceptable Justice tells us all we need to know.
The sorry spectacle of Republicans putting judicial activist liberal Justices on the USSC will repeat itself, if we let Rudy become President.