Laugh it up.
You seem to place a great reliance on creationist websites. I have some expertise in radiocarbon dating, and I am gradually researching and demolishing creationist's lies in that field. One at a time. I do have other things to do, you know.
I've "pointed out a few errors?" Yes, I have. And those errors are still on the creationist websites, where they can delude those who don't know any better. (Do you recommend that I email those websites and ask them to correct their misstatements? Do you think they would do so? Maybe if you emailed them, as a creationist, and pointed out their errors they would remove them. What do you think?)
It may take me a while, but I'll catch all of those errors in this field eventually--one at a time. Then where will you be?
Oh, right. Right back where you are now, because for you it is not a matter of science (facts, evidence, logic, reason, etc.). For you it is a matter of religious belief -- you just use science where you think you can fool somebody who may not know the real story.
Well, in radiocarbon dating, I happen to know a bit of science and I can spot the creationist's errors and lies. You can look forward to seeing one after another of the favorite creationist's claims debunked here, and perhaps elsewhere. (I will leave it to other experts to debunk creationist's claims in other fields.)
[ (Do you recommend that I email those websites and ask them to correct their misstatements? Do you think they would do so? Maybe if you emailed them, as a creationist, and pointed out their errors they would remove them. What do you think?)]
Ya know- I’d have actually concidered doing just that if you asked HAD you not decided a long time ago to respond to my posts with nothing but contempt aNd pettiness- I had acvtually requested you do so in a thread, and it became apparent you had no intention of changing.
I’m all for being accurate as possible, and do agree with you that the few mistakes a site has should be cleared up- but folks like you spend your free time looking for the few mistakes, while ignoring the bulk of facts that you don’t agree with, and you use those few mistakes to try to malign and berate the whole site and authors based on nothign but a few mistakes. Apparently mistakes aren’t allowed when it comes to sites that don’t march to the tune of evolution- but mistakes, half-truths, outright deceits and blatant lies are perfectly acceptable in your mind when the sites support evo.
(Do you suppose talkorigins will retract al lthe mistakes, half-truths, and outright lies if maybe you called them on their deceits and asked them to? Maybe if you emailed them, as an evo, and pointed out their errors they would remove them. What do you think?)
[You can look forward to seeing one after another of the favorite creationist’s claims debunked here, and perhaps elsewhere.]
And you can look forward to my posting the facts IF you don’t do so with intellectual honesty. As well you can look forward to me pointing out that you repeatedly try to make mountains out of molehills in an attempt to change the focus away from the bulk of factual evidences on sites that refute evo points.