[Coyoteman]

Do you know that carbon dating has to be done dozens of times usually before the “right” answer is found.

Please cite your source for this nonsense. (I have had nearly 600 radiocarbon dates done, and interpreted the results of thousands more, so make it good.)

[CottShop]

Here- buy the book-
http://creationwiki.org/The_Mythology_of_Modern_Dating_Methods

[]Please cite your source for this nonsense. (I have had nearly 600 radiocarbon dates done, and interpreted the results of thousands more, so make it good.)[]

the number one reason why dates are often ‘consistent’ is that the ones that show inconsistencies are not accepted and are explained away as the samples having been ‘contaminated by leeching’ and are thusly not accepted- The reason why most published dates are ‘consistent’ is because they fit a priori beleif. I’ts noteworthy to note how convenient it is to explain somethign away by claiming leeching/contamination happened when the dates don’t fit.

The book goes on to describe the illusion played on the public by convenient methods used by archeologists and paleantologists and how the data is manipulated. Of course- I’m sure we’ll see ad homminem attacks against Woodmorappe in an attempt to hush up what he says.

http://creationwiki.org/The_Mythology_of_Modern_Dating_Methods

[razzle]

You probably had 600 radiocarbon tests done before the “proper” date (that you idiots wanted) was found.