Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Strategerist
The current USN has far more actual combat capability than the USN in 1988, any way you look at it.

Statements like that remind me of the Czarist navy circa 1903. Everyone knew that they could beat the Japanese.

Of course, you are right. 10 carriers can be as many places as 13, 54 submarines can do as much as 100, and the current cruisers can stay in action without refueling as long as the nuclear powered ones could. And let's not forget that the top gun in the navy has grown from those puny 16 inchers to the powerful 5 inch guns.

43 posted on 06/10/2007 7:38:27 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: PAR35
And let's not forget that the top gun in the navy has grown from those puny 16 inchers to the powerful 5 inch guns.

It's the age of the Carrier now. Battleships with 16 inch guns are obsolete. Equip them with cruise missiles and you have a different story, but ship-to-ship artillery showed itself to be a failure in WW II sixty-odd years ago. The Japanese battlewagons with 18 inch guns were sunk by submarines and aircraft without ever bringing their massive arms to bear.

49 posted on 06/10/2007 9:51:53 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson