Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The logo is still evolving, say designers
The Telegraph ^ | 6/10/2007 | Simon Hart

Posted on 06/09/2007 8:13:09 PM PDT by bruinbirdman

The designers of the controversial London Olympics logo claim that they intended it as only the first part of an "evolving branding package".

The chunky, geometric shapes spelling out the date 2012 are supposed to be a "blank canvas" that will be filled with diverse images, photographs and sponsorship messages over the next five years, they say.


The2012 logo is to be filled with a range of images

Many of the images used to "infill" the shapes will be created by the public, who will be encouraged to enter competitions held every six months, with the winner chosen by online votes.

During the Games, each sporting venue will have a logo bearing a separate theme. Other versions will be displayed on London streets.

Official sponsors, who have the right to use the logo to market products and services, have been granted freedom to choose their own "infills".

Last week, Lloyds TSB, the first official 2012 sponsor, produced newspaper adverts featuring the 2012 logo coloured in its blue and green corporate colours. The only constants will be the "2012" shape, the Olympic rings and the word "London".

Sources close to the organisers denied that the adverse public reaction to the logo had forced either a rapid redesign or a decision to speed up the release of further details. They said the later stages of the logo plans could not be revealed last week because of fears that non-sponsors would plagiarise the "infill" design.

Lawyers advised managers that only the outline shape should be released, along with the four base colours: pink, orange, blue and green. It was pointed out that at last week's launch, Paul Deighton, the London 2012 chief executive, said: "The shape is constant, but it'll never be static or dull and will evolve over the next five years."

Originally, the "infill" concept was intended to be made public in several months, when the initial logo was well-established in the public eye. However, those plans have now been pushed forward and the first "infilled" logo may be released by Friday.

The sources said the vast publicity surrounding the logo - albeit much of it negative - had made the image so well-known that organisers could proceed to this next stage more rapidly than previously planned.

Jacques Rogge, the International Olympic Committee president, has described the design as "an indication of the dynamism, modernity and inclusiveness with which London 2012 will leave its Olympic mark".


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: 2012olympics; logo

1 posted on 06/09/2007 8:13:12 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

2 posted on 06/09/2007 8:14:17 PM PDT by al baby (Hi mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: bruinbirdman

No crescents is good sign.


4 posted on 06/09/2007 8:19:28 PM PDT by quantim (2008 => I'll take an imperfect winner over a perfect loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
The designers of the controversial London Olympics logo claim that they intended it as only the first part of an "evolving branding package".

How much did they get paid for this "evolving" POS?

5 posted on 06/09/2007 8:24:20 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
NYC should have won by logo alone!


6 posted on 06/09/2007 8:26:43 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
How much did they get paid for this "evolving" POS?

See? You thought it was easy to polish a turd.

Next time you'll know

7 posted on 06/09/2007 8:27:44 PM PDT by IncPen (The Liberal's Reward is Self Disgust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: IncPen
At least the Soviets did not mess around, they left no doubt about the symbolism behind their logo.


8 posted on 06/09/2007 8:31:58 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

I know how to fix the issues for the London Olympic committee. Take those chunky symbols and put a burka around them, just like what’s happening all over Britain in everyday life. That will not only obscure poor design but also accuarately reflect the state of affairs in Northern Europe.


9 posted on 06/09/2007 9:06:52 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
That logo is so wrong. But so is this:
10 posted on 06/09/2007 9:33:47 PM PDT by Jamil Hussein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quantim
No crescents is a good sign. But, I wonder how long before they get upset over this, though... (ZION?)
11 posted on 06/09/2007 9:56:44 PM PDT by Jamil Hussein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
How much did they get paid for this "evolving" POS?
 

400,000 UK.

All publicity is good publicity, and this synthetic "controversy" accomplished exactly what they intended: People are talking, and in the end they will grace us with a new "Peoples' Logo" that everyone loves.

It was purely a scam for attention, and it worked. The Olympics are getting a bargain for this manipulative bulls--t.

12 posted on 06/09/2007 11:10:35 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

You give them to much credit. It is a crappy design and they know it now. They should have spent a few pounds on a focus group before they released this to the public.


13 posted on 06/09/2007 11:19:48 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Kind of reminds me of the Nationwide Insurance logo they came out with after they ditched their eagle.

They paid someone a lot of money for this logo, too! LOL!

Kevin Federline Nationwide Super Bowl Commercial

14 posted on 06/10/2007 12:06:51 AM PDT by Tamar1973 (Riding the Korean Wave, one BYJ movie at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
Neither did USA during the Reagan Era. Ahh, the olden days of Cold War when even sports became politicized...


15 posted on 06/10/2007 5:08:12 AM PDT by MirrorField (Just an opinion from atheist, minarchist and small-l libertarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

This is a good example of design by consensus, rather than using a good linear design process. Designs that evolve publicly disrupt everyone and tend to end up as inferior products.


16 posted on 06/10/2007 5:46:50 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman; All

looks like the copied the “ZOOM” children’s TV show.


17 posted on 06/10/2007 5:52:15 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson