Did he immediately fire him in 1992 or did he immediately fire him in 1994?
Writing in the same 1992 edition, Paul expressed the popular idea that government should lower the age at which accused juvenile criminals can be prosecuted as adults.
He added, We dont think a child of 13 should be held responsible as a man of 23. Thats true for most people, but black males age 13 who have been raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary and culpable as any adult and should be treated as such.
Paul also asserted that complex embezzling is conducted exclusively by non-blacks.
What else do we need to know about the political establishment than that it refuses to discuss the crimes that terrify Americans on grounds that doing so is racist? Why isnt that true of complex embezzling, which is 100 percent white and Asian? he wrote.
In later newsletters, Paul aimed criticism at the Israeli governments U.S. lobbying efforts and reported allegations that President Clinton used cocaine and fathered illegitimate children.
Stating that lobbying groups who seek special favors and handouts are evil, Paul wrote, By far the most powerful lobby in Washington of the bad sort is the Israeli government and that the goal of the Zionist movement is to stifle criticism.
Relaying a rumor that Clinton was a longtime cocaine user, Paul wrote in 1994 that the speculation would explain certain mysteries about the presidents scratchy voice and insomnia.
None of this is conclusive, of course, but it sure is interesting, he said.
http://www.chron.com/content/chronicle/aol-metropolitan/96/05/23/paul.html
Paul fired them sometime between ‘1992 and 1996; don’t know when. He slapped his name on some rag and didn’t even hear about it until it became public.