Let’s just say for now I agree with replacing the citizenship part too.
Here’s the case which established the precedent for the current interpretation of the 14th.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plyler_v._Doe
I believe that it’s a misinterpretation, or misapplication by liberal courts, of the original intent of 14. It needs to be reintroduced, revisited and redefined by the USSC.