Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Repeal 16-17

Let’s just say for now I agree with replacing the citizenship part too.


45 posted on 06/10/2007 1:22:32 PM PDT by Jason_b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Jason_b; Repeal 16-17

Here’s the case which established the precedent for the current interpretation of the 14th.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plyler_v._Doe

I believe that it’s a misinterpretation, or misapplication by liberal courts, of the original intent of 14. It needs to be reintroduced, revisited and redefined by the USSC.


46 posted on 06/10/2007 1:31:03 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (THOMPSON NEEDS TO CLARIFY HIS POSITION ON THE SPP BEFORE I SUPPORT HIM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson