Replies

I've thought this for a long time, but watching this one issue has made me rethink your point. I now think you are mostly wrong, and that we need to take a different tack.

I agree they are using different issues as a front to advance socialism. Liberal is a misnomer. The correct term is socialists. Conservatives preventing Socialists from replacing our Democratic Republic with Socialism is not meaningless. It is the very basis for preserving our independence.

Conservatives can exercise the latent power by distinguishing themselves from the socialists in the Republican party. Many unaffiliated Conservatives did not know where to turn in the last national elections. Some either did not vote or by some twisted thinking voted for Democrats out of frustration. Unaffiliated voters would have not voted for the Democrats if there was a party solely for Conservatives. The Socialists in both parties can be destroyed only if Conservatives unite under one party umbrella.

The Socialists in both parties can be destroyed only if Conservatives unite under one party umbrella.

No one can do anything as long as the existing parties control the process.

The names "Socialist" and "Conservative" are misleading.

Either you think the People are sovereign and can write and carry out their own laws, or you don't.

There are conservatives on both sides of this fence. Putting conservatives in power without knowing where they stand on this foundational issue is meaningless.