Replies

The “solution” he is trying to seek is to defacto erase the mexican border so that none of the illegals are illegal. This is tantamount to the destruction of the national sovereignty of what used to be the United States of America.

This deliberate act is far worse than the giving away of the canal zone, a piece of US territory, by the worst president of the 20th century by far.

See... and I thought that this was a place where we examined facts dispassionately and didn’t use wild hyperbole. “destruction of the national sovereignty of what used to be the United States of America” may be a tad bit over the top... dontcha think?

I don’t defend this bill, but I recognize that a solution becomes a pretty complex problem. “Close the border and ship’em out” is easy to say (and probably the ideal solution) but I don’t see it being that easy to do.

Before you start flaming away... take a breath and think for a minute. Advocating a bill that looks to be doomed to failure erases all the rest of Bush’s presidency? That’s the point you want to stand on?

The war... the economy... reduced taxes... homeland security... all that don’t count no more?