To: LurkedLongEnough
So much for Ron Paul blaming American foreign policy for Al Qaeda’s terrorism
To: Lib-Lickers 2
So much for Ron Paul blaming American foreign policy for Al Qaedas terrorismGood try, but the Muslim separatists have been causing problems there since at least the 1920s, immediately after WWI. This group seems to try threats against any nation it sees as invading its territory.
36 posted on
06/09/2007 8:55:47 AM PDT by
billbears
(Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
To: Lib-Lickers 2
Darn those Indians and their Zionist puppetmasters. /sarc
52 posted on
06/09/2007 9:11:12 AM PDT by
yooling
(Bring the troops home; bring the war home)
To: Lib-Lickers 2
So much for Ron Paul blaming American foreign policy for Al Qaedas terrorism I am so sick of that little prick. I want Duncan Hunter at the next debate to take Paul and give him a hanging wedgie on a microphone stand.
To: Lib-Lickers 2
86 posted on
06/09/2007 10:38:04 AM PDT by
weegee
(Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
To: Lib-Lickers 2
So much for Ron Paul blaming American foreign policy for Al Qaedas terrorism Allow me to reply for the Ron Paul supporters:
1) He didn't say that, even if you did hear him say that.
2) He didn't mean that, and has explained it. Again and again.
3) He has read the constitution and you haven't.
4) You're a Rudy-bot.
Did I get all their talking points?
144 posted on
06/09/2007 6:13:47 PM PDT by
Larry Lucido
(Duncan Hunter 2008 (or Fred Thompson if he ever makes up his mind))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson