Latest on the effort to get Judge Walton to allow Libby to remain free on bond pending appeal.
To: STARWISE; Laverne; Howlin
To: the Real fifi
When Bork agrees with Dershowitz perhaps there is something of substance here.
To: the Real fifi
Read the first lines of the last paragraph very carefully-—then send it to an editor.
4 posted on
06/08/2007 6:51:33 PM PDT by
Rudder
To: the Real fifi
Does anyone have a current figure on what this case has cost us so far?
5 posted on
06/08/2007 6:59:56 PM PDT by
gas0linealley
(.good fences make good neighbors)
To: the Real fifi
This is very interesting. Thanks.
6 posted on
06/08/2007 7:00:18 PM PDT by
heywaitadarnminute
(This post happens between 12 AM and 12 PM)
To: the Real fifi
9 posted on
06/08/2007 7:03:11 PM PDT by
God luvs America
(When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
To: the Real fifi
“The Court trusts that this is a reflection of these eminent academics’ willingness in the future to step to the plate and provide like assistance in cases involving any of the numerous litigants, both in this Court and throughout the courts of our nation, who lack the financial means to fully and properly articulate the merits of their legal positions even in instances where failure to do so could result in monetary penalties, incarceration, or worse. The Court will certainly not hesitate to call for such assistance from these luminaries, as necessary in the interests of justice and equity, whenever similar questions arise in the cases that come before it.”
Wow. So because he is not poor he is not entitled to a friend of the court brief? Constitutional scholars can only chime in for poor defendants and are chided for weighing in on Libby? What kind of judge is this?
To: the Real fifi
As I said during the trial, this judge and jury were emotionally invested, and took out their anti-Iraq anger on Libby.
That snark is just another example.
To: the Real fifi
this snarky and injudicious footnote O.K., Judge Walton wears panties under his robes. So why can't he retreat to chambers and de-wad them as necessary?
15 posted on
06/08/2007 7:25:53 PM PDT by
Stultis
(I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
To: the Real fifi
Sounds like this judge isn’t interested in following the law, just agendas.
16 posted on
06/08/2007 7:28:14 PM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
To: the Real fifi
Was that a “veiled threat” and a “Screw You” from Judge Walton I just read?
17 posted on
06/08/2007 7:35:01 PM PDT by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: the Real fifi
Libby has suffered a political lynching and that’s the truth. Fitzgerald and Walton should be shamed that their ideology trumped their expected lawful behavior. Is there no oath that attorneys take that requires them to follow the law and tell the truth, no matter what?
21 posted on
06/08/2007 9:40:59 PM PDT by
originalbuckeye
(I want a hero....I'm holding out for a hero (politically))
To: the Real fifi
George W. appointed this guy because he kicks ass when it comes to sentencing.
We need judges who will punish criminals severely.
What amazes me is that he didn’t give Libby 37 months.
To: the Real fifi
Walton’s snarky reply shows he’s still a “low-level black” with a chip on his shoulder against upper class whiteys.
To: the Real fifi
"It is an impressive show of public service when twelve prominent and distinguished current and former law professors of well-respected schools are able to amass their collective wisdom in the course of only several days to provide their legal expertise to the Court on behalf of a criminal defendant. The Court trusts that this is a reflection of these eminent academics' willingness in the future to step to the plate and provide like assistance in cases involving any of the numerous litigants, both in this Court and throughout the courts of our nation, who lack the financial means to fully and properly articulate the merits of their legal positions even in instances where failure to do so could result in monetary penalties, incarceration, or worse. The Court will certainly not hesitate to call for such assistance from these luminaries, as necessary in the interests of justice and equity, whenever similar questions arise in the cases that come before it. Incredible. That's this judge's response to some of the most prominent professors of law in our country raising serious legal issues?
To: the Real fifi
Walton sure is an arrogant p****.
29 posted on
06/09/2007 5:14:24 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
To: holdonnow
Just in case you haven’t seen this..
30 posted on
06/09/2007 5:17:23 AM PDT by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Fred'08)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson